[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
Re: What do you think about the use of category theory for specifications?
From
: fl <
freder...@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
Date
: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 04:11:01 -0700 (PDT)
Cc
:
zans....@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
References
: <
a97c6b33-de29-473f-9515-42b70064a28c@googlegroups.com
> <
44d35dc7-4b80-4bbe-81f9-548b310987d6@googlegroups.com
>
> sparsed
According to the Oxford English Dictionary, "to sparse" is no longer used since the 17th century.
(It should.) The adjective "sparse" is a bit too restrictive. So "scattered" seems better.
--
FL
Follow-Ups
:
Re: What do you think about the use of category theory for specifications?
From:
zans . . . .
References
:
What do you think about the use of category theory for specifications?
From:
zans . . . .
Re: What do you think about the use of category theory for specifications?
From:
fl
Prev by Date:
Re: RECURSIVE as a forward declaration
Next by Date:
Re: RECURSIVE as a forward declaration
Previous by thread:
Re: What do you think about the use of category theory for specifications?
Next by thread:
Re: What do you think about the use of category theory for specifications?
Index(es):
Date
Thread