Yes. I did try that on my spec (that is not as simple as the above), so the error is somewhere else :(Thanks for the answer. I'll keep digging...On Thursday, February 24, 2022 at 6:52:27 PM UTC+2 Stephan Merz wrote:Have you triedNext == \E p \in Possibilities : Increase(p)StephanOn 24 Feb 2022, at 16:15, jack malkovick <sillym...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:Another beginner question. Let's say I have something likeVARIABLE vIncrease(x) == v' = v + xPossibilities == {1, 2, 3}And I would like to define something likeNext == Increase(1) \/ Increase(2) \/ Increase(3)but using something like p \in Possibilites. I've tried all kinds of stuff but a silly subtle error makes TLA to generate only one action instead of 3.--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tlaplus" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tlaplus+u...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tlaplus/b1976433-a008-4802-aad6-fdb2ae842e65n%40googlegroups.com.