[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tlaplus] Mutually Recursive Higher Order Terms Syntax Error
> You will have to create a benchmark to determine if performance differs
> significantly between recursive operators and recursive functions.
From this I infer that there is no obvious reason stopping us from using the trick I suggested.
That's good news. Thanks.
> the existing bug #57 is about aligning TLC with the TLA+ language spec,
> i.e., fix TLC to no longer accept higher-order recursive operators.
Another reason for us to switch to using functions ASAP.
> If you believe that TLA+ should support higher-order recursive operators
> and have the capacity to design and implement it, please open an RFC at
Thanks! I certainly think TLA+ should support HO recursive operators and would
love to pick something like that up if I ever get enough free time or my employer
is happy with that. :)
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tlaplus" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tlaplus+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tlaplus/ef2d0ca2-567e-40d8-9815-13b7c65f5b73n%40googlegroups.com.