[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[tlaplus] Curious: stuttering vs recursive
- From: Huailin <huailin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 20:56:03 -0700 (PDT)
- Ironport-hdrordr: A9a23:kQvrfan8x4gLvIWtRgVKe+TTrFPpDfIT3DAbv31ZSRFFG/Fws/re+cjzsiWE7Ar5OUtQ+uxoV5PwJ081efZOjLX4QdyZNjUO1FHHEGga1+ffKl7bakrDH5BmvpuIKJIQNDSYNzETsS+d2mmF+r0bsbu6Gc6T5Ns2t00dND1XVw==
While the word "stuttering" is really precise for describing that a state is not being updated/changed and stay as is after an action got applied, I am wondering why i feel the "stuttering" semantics herein in TLA+ is equal to the "recursive" in PL or some Formal Method fields.
I am very curious why Lamport proposed the "stuttering", instead of using the "recursive", to describe a state not being changed?:--))))
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tlaplus" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tlaplus+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tlaplus/77ba2baf-e2f6-4058-a393-a9b6eabf1016n%40googlegroups.com.