Depends on whether someone who works at Amazon decides to write a TLA+ spec reproducing the bug or not; I don't think anybody outside the company has enough detail to do it. Amazon seems to have largely shifted from TLA+ to P as championed by Ankush Desai, but Ankush recently left Amazon so who knows what the future of Amazon formal methods use looks like. The last TLA+ conference was associated with ETAPS, and one of the industry track ETAPS talks was from an AWS employee where they talked about using a new Rust-based model-checker called Kani.Andrew--On Mon, Oct 27, 2025 at 8:50 AM Chris Ortiz <zitroomega@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:Some people say it is a race condition, but as I understand TLA+ is used in DynamoDB and can catch behavior such as this thatcould have been prevented.Thanks,Zitro--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tlaplus" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tlaplus+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tlaplus/ac3f4438-8cf7-41e8-9c19-2f42eb01d9fdn%40googlegroups.com.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tlaplus" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tlaplus+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tlaplus/CABj%3DxUVnugpc9WfomLuwZa4s70M5scNEVCZczUF%2BK8yw0FsN%2Bw%40mail.gmail.com.