Would that translate to something like
{ s \in S : \A i \in 1..n, k \in 1..m, j \in 1..p : E_i = \epsilon(i)} }
to mean the state s in S such that the energy of s is \epsilon(i)
for m macrostates and p microstates.
On Monday, April 29, 2024 at 5:41:46 PM UTC+12 Stephan Merz wrote:
TLA+ has bounded set comprehension:
{ x \in S : P(x) }
Unbounded comprehension is disallowed: this helps making the definition of Russell’s “set” illegal.
Stephan
How can I define State_I as the state at energy level \epsilon(I)} ?
State_I \in {energy_level : energy_level = \epsilon(I)}
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tlaplus" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to
tlaplus+u...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.