[tlaplus] Re: Defining State_I as the state at energy level \epsilon(I)

[marta zhango <martazhango@xxxxxxxxx>]

Energy_Condition == \A I \in 1..n, k \in 1..m, l \in 1..L : 
  State_I \in {energy_level : energy_level = \epsilon(I)} => N[I][k] >= 0 
    /\ Microstates[I][k] \subseteq {microstate : microstate at energy level I}

I The energy level
k The macrostate
l The microstate

On Monday, April 29, 2024 at 1:22:58 PM UTC+12 marta zhango wrote:

How can I define State_I as the state at energy level \epsilon(I)} ?

State_I \in {energy_level : energy_level = \epsilon(I)}

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tlaplus" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tlaplus+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tlaplus/44481609-6305-48d4-a453-9804415328d2n%40googlegroups.com.