[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[tlaplus] TLA+ for testing computational algorithms rather than verify mathematical proofs

From: marta zhango <martazhango@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2024 15:49:04 -0700 (PDT)

Have been reading the book TLA+ of Hillel. It is as though TLA+ is only useful

to test computations algorithms. One cannot test mathematical proofs. Is this

correct ?

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tlaplus" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tlaplus+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tlaplus/48640047-49ce-4d12-899b-acea04612b3bn%40googlegroups.com.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlaplus] TLA+ for testing computational algorithms rather than verify mathematical proofs
  - From: 'Martin' via tlaplus

Prev by Date: [tlaplus] Re: Best practices / advise on (de)structuring specs (modularize)
Next by Date: Re: [tlaplus] TLA+ for testing computational algorithms rather than verify mathematical proofs
Previous by thread: [tlaplus] Re: Installing Ulpian Release on Ubunte Machine
Next by thread: Re: [tlaplus] TLA+ for testing computational algorithms rather than verify mathematical proofs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread