Let's say that I have a set of integers, and I totally need
them to be numbers and not model values so that they are
comparable and I can perform arithmetic. Eg.:
Vals == 1..5
Tuples = Vals \X Vals
\X Vals
with (t \in Tuples){
...
}
But then in my particular problem I know that
<<1,2,3>> is equivalent to <<3,1,2>> and
<<2,3,1>>. Is there some way of filtering Tuples so that I can
avoid exploring the two latter equivalent cases? Ideally the
solution should scale to long sequences, not just 3 elements.
It would be nice if I could define a set of symmetric values
in the model overview form.
Or if I could define an external generator coded in Java that
I could plug in into the spec. That way I could keep track of
already generated states in the Java code and only return
non-equivalent combinations.
Or maybe have TLA+ accept some external file that I could
generate with a programming language of my choice.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "tlaplus" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to
tlaplus+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tlaplus/a9174435-acc5-43a7-9ec9-83fdbba308f4n%40googlegroups.com.