Re: [tlaplus] Strategies for scalable modeling of append-only logs

[Markus Kuppe <tlaplus-google-group@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

It's possible that a view (compare section 14.3.3, p. 243ff, Specifying Systems) can achieve the same results without changing the Spec.

M. 

> On Oct 20, 2023, at 1:54 PM, Jones Martins <jonesmvc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> [...]
> The community module SequencesExt contains a IsSuffix(_) operator. Every action that changes the log would be written like AddOne:
> EquivalentSuffixes == { <<"+1", "-1">>, <<"-1", "+1">>, <<"+1", "-1", "div2", "-1">> } AppendToLog(log, event) == LET newLog == log \o <<event>> IN IF \E suffix \in EquivalentSuffixes: IsSuffix(suffix, newLog) THEN log ELSE newLog AddOne == /\ x' = x + 1 /\ log' = AppendToLog(log, "+1") 
> By compressing log, the state space would contain a subset of possible logs, which might be a problem…
> I haven’t tested any of this, by the way, but I’m curious to know if there are any other solutions.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tlaplus" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tlaplus+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tlaplus/4019A0DE-670B-430C-86D0-DED53827DFA4%40lemmster.de.