[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[tlaplus] Re: simple toy theorem

Did this new assumption introduced an inconsistency? I don't see how, but I miss something for sure...

On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 12:26:26 PM UTC+2 jack malkovick wrote:
Let's say we have this simple theorem

        NEW NEW S(_), NEW U(_), NEW M(_), NEW P(_),
        \A x : M(x) = S(x) /\ ~U(x),
        \A x : P(x) = M(x)
        \A x : P(x) => S(x)

It is true.
If I negate the goal to \E x : ~(P(x) => S(x)) same as \E x : P(x) /\ ~S(x) it becomes red.

However, if I add another assumption
NEW B(_), \A x : B(x) = S(x) /\ U(x),
The theorem turns green! How can this new assumption make the theorem true?

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tlaplus" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tlaplus+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tlaplus/d0896133-b1b7-4bce-9d53-575d4f9f52afn%40googlegroups.com.