[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

*From*: Stephan Merz <stephan.merz@xxxxxxxxx>*Date*: Tue, 28 Jun 2022 17:55:43 +0200*References*: <9e859fd3-6d18-43f6-81b0-ed329f780047n@googlegroups.com> <2C070E7E-A900-4476-B102-808738D0A34A@gmail.com> <6d08a54c-e7eb-47ed-a8d2-5e551c4cac09n@googlegroups.com>

> One more question, you say "When I comment out this useless fairness condition, TLC throws an exception that appears to indicate that some internal tables become too big.". I also encounter the problem, and I want to know what is meant by "some internal tables become too big". Does it mean that some data structures in TLC can not support the size of the action in the `Next`? It's not the next-state relation that's the problem but the fairness conditions: TLC has to monitor for each fairness condition at which state the underlying action is enabled and which transitions correspond to the action being taken. I do not know how TLC represents this information, but apparently it is not meant to handle a lot of fairness conditions (remember that you have to multiply the RM actions by the number of resource managers in the model). Stephan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tlaplus" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tlaplus+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tlaplus/556DE16C-105F-46E9-B580-5BC5DD4C274D%40gmail.com.

**Follow-Ups**:

**References**:

- Prev by Date:
**Re: [tlaplus] Question about "Temporal formula is a tautology" in fairness** - Next by Date:
**Re: [tlaplus] Question about "Temporal formula is a tautology" in fairness** - Previous by thread:
**Re: [tlaplus] Question about "Temporal formula is a tautology" in fairness** - Next by thread:
**Re: [tlaplus] Question about "Temporal formula is a tautology" in fairness** - Index(es):