[tlaplus] on tlaps semantics

[Алексей Тимаков <timakov.alan@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi all

Can anyone tell me why this assumption cannot be proved.

THEOREM TEST4 == ASSUME NEW P1, NEW P2, NEW pred1 (_,_), NEW l, NEW pred2(_),
                        l =  {x \in {pred1(c1, c2) : c1 \in P1, c2 \in P2} : pred2(x)}
                        PROVE \A l1 \in l : \E s1 \in P1, s2 \in P2 : l1 = pred1(s1, s2)
                 PROOF OBVIOUS  

or even

THEOREM TEST2 == ASSUME NEW P1, NEW P2, NEW pred1 (_,_), NEW l,
                        l =  {pred1(c1, c2) : c1 \in P1, c2 \in P2}
                        PROVE \A l1 \in l : \E s1 \in P1, s2 \in P2 : l1 = pred1(s1, s2)
                 PROOF OBVIOUS   

Thanks.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tlaplus" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tlaplus+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tlaplus/bd3b0337-27ab-40e7-9eef-faf5d4c34256n%40googlegroups.com.