[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[tlaplus] Questions about verifying properties

From: Jones Martins <jonesmvc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2022 11:04:54 -0800 (PST)

Hello,

Why does TLC complain of both <>[](\A p \in Procs: state[p] = "Done") or \A p \in Procs: <>[](state[p] = "Done")saying that properties containing actions should be of forms <>[](A) or []<>(A), but no property in my spec contains any actions.

Jones

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tlaplus" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tlaplus+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tlaplus/45155509-538f-43db-816d-dbbc54623215n%40googlegroups.com.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlaplus] Questions about verifying properties
  - From: Stephan Merz

Prev by Date: [tlaplus] TLA+ tree-sitter grammar updates
Next by Date: Re: [tlaplus] Questions about verifying properties
Previous by thread: Re: [tlaplus] TLA+ tree-sitter grammar updates
Next by thread: Re: [tlaplus] Questions about verifying properties
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread