[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
[tlaplus] Re: Inconsistent access control policies checking using TLA+
From
: Roger Bigger <
roger.bigger@xxxxxxxxx
>
Date
: Tue, 5 Jan 2021 07:23:36 -0800 (PST)
References
: <
7d71dcb9-c21d-4513-b292-0692f65d0e9b@googlegroups.com
> <
d40f0de8-f893-4f4d-8eae-0f1c75796f28@googlegroups.com
> <
3674639f-afa7-49e6-8801-41ebc4edcc86@googlegroups.com
>
Hi Hillel Wayne,
How did this go? I've got a similar project (lots of complex access rules) and would like to know how your project went.
On Wednesday, March 7, 2018 at 6:37:11 AM UTC-5 knnik...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Thanks,
Hillel Wayne.
This helps me to write spec :-)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tlaplus" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to
tlaplus+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tlaplus/7c2d2fc6-694d-41d4-b43e-1c247c23d165n%40googlegroups.com
.
References
:
Inconsistent access control policies checking using TLA+
From:
knnik . . .
Re: Inconsistent access control policies checking using TLA+
From:
Hillel Wayne
Re: Inconsistent access control policies checking using TLA+
From:
knnik . . .
Prev by Date:
Re: [tlaplus] Version control for models?
Next by Date:
[tlaplus] How come defined functions don't work in assignment?
Previous by thread:
Re: Inconsistent access control policies checking using TLA+
Next by thread:
Set operations and emptiness
Index(es):
Date
Thread