Thanks Stephen! I should have said that I'd already translated it, I didn't include the translation for brevity (always a mistake, when will I learn?).I'll try moving my theorem to the end of the TLA+ translation, thanks!
On Wednesday, April 15, 2020 at 4:11:06 PM UTC+1, Stephan Merz wrote:1. Your algorithm is written in PlusCal, which appears as a comment to TLA+. You first need to generate the TLA+ specification (File -> Translate PlusCal Algorithm in the Toolbox).2. Your theorem should then be stated as a consequence of the specification in the formTHEOREM diagseq == Spec => (diag = tdiag)Its proof will look like "BY DEF Spec, Init". Note that your assertion only talks about the initial state.Regards,StephanOn 15 Apr 2020, at 17:04, christi...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:Hi!I've written a specification to transpose a matrix, but I don't know how I use TLAPS to prove correctness. I've tried:
---- MODULE transp ----EXTENDS Naturals, TLCCONSTANT n, m(* --algorithm transposevariables i=1, j=1, array = <<<<>>,<<>>>>,transp = <<<<>>,<<>>>>, diag = <<>>, tdiag = <<>>,beginwhile j <= m doi := 1;while i <= n dotransp[i][j]:= array[j][i];if i = j thendiag[j]:=array[j][i];tdiag[j]:=transp[i][j];end if;i := i+1;end while;j := j+1;end while;print array;print transp;end algorithm *)THEOREM diagseq == diag=tdiagPROOFOBVIOUSBut I get the error that tdiag is unknown. I'm not sure what I'm not understanding so any help would be appreciated!--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tlaplus" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tla...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tlaplus/a70545cd-37a0- .430a-aad5-bc303a0f33e0% 40googlegroups.com