Re: [tlaplus] Existential quantifier over integers

Hello,

TLC cannot enumerate infinite sets. A typical workaround for quantifier bounds involving infinite sets is to override a set such as Int by a small finite set such as -2 .. 2 if appropriate. (See "Additional Spec Options" -> "Definition Override").

For the snippet shown in the message, I suggest that you avoid quantification altogether and write something like

ServerResponse ==

/\ serverSt.status = "processing"

/\ serverSt' = [serverSt EXCEPT !.status = "idle"]

/\ msgs' = msgs \cup {[type |-> "response", to |-> serverSt.from, res |-> (serverSt.a + serverSt.b)]}

/\ UNCHANGED clientSt

Note that here the value of serverSt stays a record even when the status is "idle" so that the first conjunct makes sense (and evaluates to FALSE) even if the server is idle. You may want to reset the other record fields to default values so that TLC doesn't generate distinct states that differ only in values of irrelevant record fields.

I believe that you can similarly rewrite the actions ServerReceive and ClientReceive. You still need quantification over integers in ClientSend for expressing non-determinism, and here you will have to use a finite set instead for model checking.

Hope this helps,

Stephan

On 4 Feb 2020, at 13:09, abel.nieto90@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

I'm getting started with TLA+ and wrote a spec for a simple server that adds two integers: https://pastebin.com/Yc8qfwa7

When I run TLC, I get the following error:

The exception was a java.lang.RuntimeException
: TLC encountered a non-enumerable quantifier bound
Int.
line 46, col 34 to line 46, col 36 of module Addition
The error occurred when TLC was evaluating the nested
expressions at the following positions:
0. Line 46, column 3 to line 50, column 27 in Addition
1. Line 46, column 6 to line 49, column 84 in Addition

The errors refers to a "non-enumerable quantifier bound Int", but `Int` is an enumerable set.

The relevant snippet of my code reads

ServerResponse == \* server responds
/\ \E fromV \in CLIENT, aV \in Int, bV \in Int :
   /\ serverSt = [status |-> "processing", from |-> fromV, a |-> aV, b |-> bV]
   /\ serverSt' = "idle"
   /\ msgs' = msgs \cup {[type |-> "response", to |-> fromV, res |-> (aV + bV)]}
/\ UNCHANGED <<clientSt>>

What am I doing wrong here? And what's the idiomatic way to "deconstruct" records in TLA?

Thanks!

Abel

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tlaplus" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tlaplus+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tlaplus/2051d601-952a-434a-a93a-ebccb87843b9%40googlegroups.com.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tlaplus" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tlaplus+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tlaplus/2A642E4C-42AA-40F4-B181-EFE289138E9E%40gmail.com.