Hi Han,
A fingerprint collision probability of 7.0E-14 is a
0.000000000007% chance your spec had a hash collision. I'd say
you're safe :)
H
On 9/4/19 11:29 AM, Han wrote:
Hi,
I've read this thread and the referenced older thread,
including this description: "Deciding
if the hash collision probability is sufficiently low
requires
engineering judgment."
however I still was wondering:
When should we try to judge about the notification of
Fingerprint collision probability ? Is there any case where it
indicates a problem with our TLA+ Spec?
Currently, my spec running TLC model checker shows:
"Fingerprint collision probability: calculated: 7.0E-14" , I
don't know if it's something I should fix with my spec.
Thanks,
Han
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "tlaplus" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to tlaplus+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tlaplus/CAEjGaqfFofphCk3ZLLMekyWzYSiTFc2xK_tzCEQVkEj_pkv51w%40mail.gmail.com.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tlaplus" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tlaplus+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tlaplus/67a85530-5de3-8efb-0906-17e4051b36d5%40gmail.com.
|