[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
Re: [tlaplus] TLA+ logic
From
: fl <
freder...@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
Date
: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 09:04:46 -0800 (PST)
References
: <
dbc52c84-b6ce-4326-aeec-a7c17dd257c0@googlegroups.com
> <
33ED3621-4D95-4167-9232-9404968DD8E7@gmail.com
> <
02b4212f-9e09-4759-96a6-d73e7ae0881f@googlegroups.com
> <
f77ca825-b389-47df-9470-c2caf60b6eb1@googlegroups.com
> <
f22db1b8-fc80-4f82-85a6-3abfcb0cdfb3@googlegroups.com
> <
7fad13e8-71b5-4a59-9539-43bc0c530d78@googlegroups.com
>
> Now my question is whether the requirement to limit the domain ever makes a difference in practice so that it actually
> reduces expressivity.
Use TLAPLUS it is a good system. All what you need to work about an algorithm is here.
--
FL
References
:
TLA+ logic
From:
Ron Pressler
Re: [tlaplus] TLA+ logic
From:
Stephan Merz
Re: [tlaplus] TLA+ logic
From:
Ron Pressler
Re: [tlaplus] TLA+ logic
From:
fl
Re: [tlaplus] TLA+ logic
From:
fl
Re: [tlaplus] TLA+ logic
From:
Ron Pressler
Prev by Date:
Re: [tlaplus] TLA+ logic
Next by Date:
Re: [tlaplus] TLA+ logic
Previous by thread:
Re: [tlaplus] TLA+ logic
Next by thread:
Re: [tlaplus] TLA+ logic
Index(es):
Date
Thread