Re: [tlaplus] Apropos selling formal methods (Galois article link)

[Irwansyah Irwansyah <irwansyah@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Finn,

In my understanding, the company is using Coq and not TLA+ and both have different concerns, right? TLA+ is less on math and proof while Coq is heavy on math and proof. So if the company is using TLA+ shouldn't the project be way more cheaper than using Coq?

Irwan

On Sun, Jul 13, 2025 at 2:07 PM Finn Hackett <fhackett.py@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Someone recently reminded me of this article, and I think it adds to conversation about contracts here. Maybe some of the learnings are applicable. https://www.galois.com/articles/what-works-and-doesnt-selling-formal-methods

I know at least one other person here saw this already, but maybe not everyone.

Best,

-Finn

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tlaplus" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tlaplus+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tlaplus/CAJs285nvmYE-pkMU65FMg6QOz5H8gvY0CSa%2B7%3DzA9imUj7xpbA%40mail.gmail.com.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tlaplus" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tlaplus+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tlaplus/CA%2BKOs4yC%2BoPBYUxM97zmAV_wBrU5V4qDkcdw_Mh%3D%2BxwzCD89vg%40mail.gmail.com.