[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[tlaplus] Are miscellaneous constructs in pluscal syntax

From: Latofat Bobojonova <latofatbobojonova@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2023 03:15:41 -0700 (PDT)

Hello,

I was wondering if definitions such as

- LET IN

- CASE ... OTHER

can come in pluscal scope? (i.e. inside -- algortihm).

I found them in pluscal documentations but I think they are explicitly pure TLA+ code and testing it on my IDE proved it right. Just wanted to double check it here and get more context on why is that so and if there is a list of such "only TLA+" things.

Many thanks,

Latofat

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tlaplus" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tlaplus+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tlaplus/59792da2-4a95-4e12-bb32-cc245440755an%40googlegroups.com.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlaplus] Are miscellaneous constructs in pluscal syntax
  - From: Stephan Merz

Prev by Date: Re: [tlaplus] Is there an approach that allows the TLA+ Toolbox to read the initial state from a predefined text file?
Next by Date: Re: [tlaplus] Are miscellaneous constructs in pluscal syntax
Previous by thread: Re: [tlaplus] Is there an approach that allows the TLA+ Toolbox to read the initial state from a predefined text file?
Next by thread: Re: [tlaplus] Are miscellaneous constructs in pluscal syntax
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread