[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

*From*: jack malkovick <sillymouse333@xxxxxxxxx>*Date*: Thu, 24 Feb 2022 10:51:37 -0800 (PST)*References*: <b1976433-a008-4802-aad6-fdb2ae842e65n@googlegroups.com> <052D91DB-0BC6-4117-9B4E-216BA58E605D@gmail.com> <647e89ae-0edf-43a6-8b5d-f8d5ca1c03ban@googlegroups.com>

An update to my silly problem. The issue was that x was added at a later time and I was using a view... unfortunately I did not update the view also :)

On Thursday, February 24, 2022 at 7:37:03 PM UTC+2 jack malkovick wrote:

Yes. I did try that on my spec (that is not as simple as the above), so the error is somewhere else :(Thanks for the answer. I'll keep digging...On Thursday, February 24, 2022 at 6:52:27 PM UTC+2 Stephan Merz wrote:Have you triedNext == \E p \in Possibilities : Increase(p)StephanOn 24 Feb 2022, at 16:15, jack malkovick <sillym...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:Another beginner question. Let's say I have something likeVARIABLE vIncrease(x) == v' = v + xPossibilities == {1, 2, 3}And I would like to define something likeNext == Increase(1) \/ Increase(2) \/ Increase(3)but using something like p \in Possibilites. I've tried all kinds of stuff but a silly subtle error makes TLA to generate only one action instead of 3.--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tlaplus" group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tlaplus+u...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tlaplus/b1976433-a008-4802-aad6-fdb2ae842e65n%40googlegroups.com.

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tlaplus" group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tlaplus+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tlaplus/877e8b26-148f-4667-b22b-6dc479163965n%40googlegroups.com.

**References**:**[tlaplus] Defining multiple possible actions in one line***From:*jack malkovick

**Re: [tlaplus] Defining multiple possible actions in one line***From:*Stephan Merz

**Re: [tlaplus] Defining multiple possible actions in one line***From:*jack malkovick

- Prev by Date:
**Re: [tlaplus] Defining multiple possible actions in one line** - Next by Date:
**[tlaplus] Function sets with distinct mappings** - Previous by thread:
**Re: [tlaplus] Defining multiple possible actions in one line** - Next by thread:
**[tlaplus] Function sets with distinct mappings** - Index(es):