[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

*From*: Stephan Merz <stephan.merz@xxxxxxxxx>*Date*: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 09:28:41 +0100*References*: <62e4f654-bdaf-473b-bc7a-18ad3d1e9f7dn@googlegroups.com>

You may want to look at the thread [1] where a similar question has been discussed. In short, if you need to assume that the choice is fair, the appropriate fairness condition cannot be expressed in PlusCal and should be written in TLA+. Stephan
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tlaplus" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tlaplus+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tlaplus/B6C9B908-9250-48C1-8D2A-2E5C40919F9C%40gmail.com. |

**References**:

- Prev by Date:
**[tlaplus] how TLA+ verify the crash model?** - Next by Date:
**Re: [tlaplus] Guarantee message passing** - Previous by thread:
**[tlaplus] how TLA+ verify the crash model?** - Next by thread:
**[tlaplus] Using PlusCal/TLA+ to model an interrupt driven system** - Index(es):